“We don’t just follow power. We fixate on it”
Take a prince. Not the purple one – though he understood obsession better than most-but Prince Andrew Mountbatten, Duke of York: a man who once moved through drawing rooms with naval posture and inherited assurance. What fascinates is not the scandal (history has already made its notations), but the spectacle of proximity to power. We are obsessed not merely with royalty, but with adjacency. Titles cling. They glitter. Even when tarnished, we cannot quite look away. The Duchesses-of Kent, of anywhere- understand the choreography of retreat. A well-timed withdrawal can be as compelling as an entrance. The monarchy survives not on relevance, but on ritualised fixation.
“Titles fade. Obsession lingers.”
And then there are the Momagers. The modern matriarchal impresarios of cheekbone and commerce. The fascination with a facelift-whose, how much, how often-is less about dermatology and more about immortality. To refashion the face is to wage war against time, and in Hollywood, time is the only true enemy. We watch the before and after as though studying Renaissance restoration. Has the fresco been improved? Or merely preserved? The camera, pitiless and devotional, keeps its own ledger.
“Proximity to power is its own addiction.”
Melania, meanwhile, prepares a documentary. I find that irresistible. The quietest figure in the room choosing, at last, to narrate it. Obsession thrives on silence; we fill in what is not said. A documentary promises revelation but often delivers something subtler: curation. To control the frame is to control the myth. America has always adored reinvention, and the First Lady-former, future, or otherwise-remains one of its most polished canvases.
“Control the frame. Control the myth.”
Closer to home, our own theatre of fixation plays nightly. Luxon versus Hipkins versus Seymour and Peters: a quartet performing democracy with varying degrees of fervour. New Zealand pretends to dislike spectacle, yet we dissect polling numbers with the intensity of racing odds. We speak of policy, but we obsess over posture. Who hesitated. Who smirked. Who won the room. Politics is personality in a sensible suit. The debates are less about legislation than about narrative control. And narrative, like obsession, is a creature that must be fed.
“Elections aren’t just won on numbers but narrative.”
Rialto View, obsession finds more intimate quarters.